The Occult Review: December 1934
Editorial
To every thoughtful observer it must be apparent
that a state of seething unrest and flux similar to that which
characterises the world of action and economics to-day, exists
also in the world of thought. New ideas in physics, metaphysics,
philosophy and religion spring up in bewildering
profusion, with the result that the human mind is assailed by
a feeling of impotence, and men are certain of nothing except
their own ignorance.
Some such mood apparently inspired
the words with which Mr. J. W. Dunne concludes the Introduction
to his new book, "The Serial Universe." He says, "there
is a fairly general feeling that, in the alembic our science offers
us to-day, the irrationalities are far too numerous. It is a true
story; but it looks as if, somewhere, somehow, it had been made
into 'Printer's Pie'. The right words are there, but they seem
to be in the wrong places; and there is more than a suggestion
that paragraphs which ought to have been consecutive have become
superimposed. Waves, particles, space-time, quanta, and even sense-data
must, we feel, fit together in some simpler fashion."
In a strain somewhat similar
to that of Mr. Dunne, Maeterlinck, the famous Belgian philosopher,
writing in his latest book, recently translated into English under
the title, "The Supreme Law" says of the scientists
of to-day, that "never have they plunged further into the
dark, because never have they searched for the light more avidly,
By dint of digging they have only deepened their ignorance. Let
us not lament it. It is with gravitation as with all the great
problems of the world; the more one studies them the more do they
become covered with obscurity; but an instinct nothing avails
to discourage whispers to us that these discrepancies are more
fertile than the trivial clarities which cradle the slumber of
self-complacent ignorance."
Where the work of Maurice
Maeterlinck is chiefly concerned with the problem of gravitation,
that of Mr. Dunne deals almost exclusively with the mystery of
time. The Serial Universe, in fact, is in the nature of an extension
of the hypothesis first outlined in that remarkable book, An Experiment
with Time, the significance of which appeared to the present writer
so great that a long editorial was devoted to its consideration
almost a full twelve months before the general Press awoke
to its importance.


Our Small Foot-Rule
Although gravitation is
the theme of Maeterlinck's book, this necessarily involves also
some reference to the subject of time, "the bit of eternity
sliced up by man", as he puts it; or, to quote from another
paragraph of the same work, "There is no time; there are
only imaginary measurements of a thing existing only in our imaginations.
When we seek to measure out with our small foot-rule a line that
has neither beginning nor end, we undertake a childish and ridiculous
task which means nothing and corresponds not time, which is but
a phantom, but eternity, which is the sole reality." Being
outside the province of the book in question, Maeterlinck does
not pursue his own conjectures. "The question would be above
all to know whether absolute time, that which according to Newton
is flowing everywhere and always in the same manner, actually
exists or is only eternity, which does not flow."But this",
he says, "would require another book".
Turning, then, to the problem
of gravitation, as it is approached by the gifted mind and imagination
of the celebrated writer, it is impossible not to become aware
immediately of the poetical and indeed mystical atmosphere with
which the subject becomes invested. To the average person in everyday
life, gravitation is one of those factors to which we automatically
adjust our lives. Except when we inadvertently trespass against
it, we are unaware of its existence. It took the genius of a Newton
to unmask it and demonstrate it to the satisfaction of the scientific
and logical mind. Of it may be said (paraphrasing the well-known
couplet).
"Closer is it than breathing,
Nearer than hands or feet."
Maeterlinck frankly confesses
that his attempt to sketch what is known about gravitation has
eventuated rather in a list of things which are unknown, than
in the establishment of new facts.
"Gravitation," he says,
"is probably the sole source of all movement and hence of
all life on this earth, in any case, and almost certainly everywhere
else in the universe, too. There is no inquiry which attacks more
directly and grips more closely the great mystery to which humanity
seeks the key."
Pursuing this idea, Maeterlinck
goes on to say that it is merely necessary in thought to annihilate
gravitation to see that it is the sole cause of the whole phenomenal
universe.
"A god who wished to annihilate
the world at one stroke would have only to deprive matter of its
power of attraction. Instantly everything would dissolve in what
we can no longer call space, for, considering that only the movements
and displacements of matter bring it into existence, there would
no longer be any space."
Whether, however, gravitation
is the source of all life in physical form merely, or whether
it is also the life of the ether, Maeterlinck regards as a matter
of minor significance : "It is life itself," he declares.
"If thought, as it seems to us, is the spiritual force par
excellence, why should not gravitation be entitled to the same
distinction? Does it not prove once more that matter and spirit
are dual aspects, the one visible, the other accidentally invisible,
but both equally real, of the same being; and that all discussion
of the subject is futile and childish.


What Lies Behind Gravitation?
The poet Young, whose
sombre Night Thoughts touched a melancholy chord in early Victorian
days, declared with more force than elegance that "The undevout
astronomer's mad". Even such a genius as Newton we find was
driven to the conception of some divine Power of which, gravitation
is, so to speak, an aspect, a mode of expression. In a letter
to Richard Bentley, Newton writes...
"Gravity may put the planets
into motion, but without the divine Power it could never put
them into such a circulating motion as they have about the sun."
Here we have the full and frank
confession, "the tragic and final gesture of the perplexed
scientist", as Maeterlinck phrases it. At every step Science
is driven back by some incomprehensible Power or Essence behind
all phenomena, some divine basis of everything that is. Eddington
voices the ignorance of present day science when he writes: "Something
is doing something, we do not know what."
Particularly apposite is this
phrase in connection with the phenomena of psychical research,
and especially applicable in the case of the rare but, we think,
sufficiently well authenticated phenomenon of levitation. At first
sight it seems to upset the universal law of gravitation; but
this violation of the universal rule is more apparent than real.
Were gravitation really transcended, it would seem that not only
would the physical form fly off at tremendous speed away from
the earth, but the very particles of the body itself would lose
their cohesion. Indeed, this is what apparently happens in cases
of demineralisation. These borderland phenomena beckon the way
to a deeper penetration into the laws of the physical universe,
and scientifically conducted psychic research may yet furnish
a clue to eternal problem of the relation between spirit and matter,
which has for so many ages baffled the human mind.
In a book dealing with the subject
of gravitation, Maeterlinck naturally finds himself compelled
to devote a section to a consideration of the ether, with which
conception psychic science as interpreted by Sir Oliver Lodge
is so intimately concerned. Of the hypothesis of ether Maeterlinck
says
"If ether does exist
it is so powerful, so omnipresent, so universal, so singular
and absolute, so infinite, that one may ,maintain that we and
all that exists are but ether, nothing but ether, and that time
itself is at bottom nothing but a form, a condensation of ether
which represents the great enigma, that is to say, that which
others call God. This is not to imply that ether knows what
it wishes, or that it has a plan or aim. Why should it have?
Ether is everything and that suffices for it. And thus in the
end one catches oneself admitting that this thing of which one
is most uncertain is perhaps the only thing that exists."


Back to Newton
Maeterlinck considers
that the theories of Einstein have disturbed the Newtonian conception
of the law of gravitation more in appearance than in reality.
Newton's law, he declares, is so perfect that even after two and
a half centuries of experiment of extraordinarily efficient technique,
and intensive mathematical research, only three seeming discrepancies
have been observed. And of these three he considers that two are
so trivial and insignificant as to merit little attention. The
fact of crucial significance has to do with the perihelion of
the planet Mercury; but even this apparent discrepancy is, Maeterlinck
claims, capable of interpretation by the accepted Newtonian law
of gravitation.
Relativity, whether in the restricted
sense, as based on the Michelson-Morley experiments, or the generalised
relativity based on the four-dimensional universe of Minowski,
have doubtless their part to play in the evolution of scientific
theory; but that they supersede the Newtonian hypothesis is open
to doubt, Maeterlinck pertinently reminds us of this in the question
he asks:
"'Why deny the existence
of absolute time because two observers, of whom one is stationary
and the other in motion, do not appreciate time in the same
manner? Is not the time of both the observers essentially human?"
The problem of time is less likely,
we feel, to be advanced appreciably towards a solution by any
such assumption as that indicated by the question above quoted.
Far more promising, surely, is the line of approach initiated
by Mr. J. W. Dunne in his first and, in the consideration of many,
epoch-making work, Experiment with Time,
Since the appearance of his book
in 1927, Mr. Dunne has laboured diligently in the development
of his hypothesis and its proofs, and now presents his arguments
in a new book, The Serial Universe, to which allusion has above
been made. The empirical basis of Mr. Dunne's theory is found
in the fact of some curious dream experiences, of which he was
the subject. Most people, however, have had similar instances
of "dreaming true" at some time of their lives. The
mysterious element of foreknowledge exhibited in certain types
of dream set Mr. Dunne thinking. As a result he arrived at the
conception of a serial universe.
This conception of a serial
universe has this in common with the theory of relativity, that
both imply some sort of regression. In the one case we have the
element of relativity introduced by the comparison of the stationary
and the moving observer, and in the other case we have the same
relative element in the regression both of time and consciousness.
Mr. Dunne sketches the outlines of his theory in the following
paragraph taken from the second chapter of his new work:


The Regressive Observer
...the first essential
for any science which can satisfy us as fitting the facts of
experience is that it shall employ some method of description
which is suitably regressive. It turns out that the possibility
of viewing all experience in terms of 'time' provides us with
just the method of description required. The notion of absolute
time is a pure regress. Its employment results in exhibiting
us as self-conscious observers. It introduces the notion of
'change', allotting to us the ability to initiate changes in
a change- resisting 'not-self'. It treats the self-conscious
observer as regressive, and it describes the external world
as it would appear to such a regressive individual. Thus it
fulfills all the requirements of the situation. But time does
more than that. By conferring on the observer the ability to
interfere with what he observes and to watch the subsequent
results, it introduces the possibility of experimental science.
The notion of experiment implies always an interference with
the observed system by an observer outside that system. This
is the cardinal method of physics, which postulates, thus, from
the outset the possibility of interference with every system
by an observer who, in relation to that system, is 'free'. The
essential point here, however, is that physics, as a science
of experiment-of 'alter it and seems based upon the notion of
time. So, for that matter, are all our systems of practical
politics, ethical or otherwise. In that way only-by the employment
of this flagrantly regressive method of description-have we
been able to convert our otherwise irrational knowledge into
a systematic and serviceable scheme."
Again he points out that
any satisfactory explanation of the phenomenal universe must proceed,
as it were, backwards. "We must take the world of our present-day
knowledge, show that it is regressive, show that it is described
as if it were viewed by a regressive observer, and show that this
imagined regressive individual would constitute a self-conscious
human being. That will be conclusive evidence that we are self-conscious
creatures who are using that regressive method of defining ourselves
and our surroundings."


Consciousness Is Immortal
The one stable element
in this universal flux is consciousness, the immortal Watcher.
Time and space, as the seers of the ages have affirmed repeatedly,
are illusions born of the brain of man. In essence we are immortal.
One of the accepted methods of meditation as practised in the
East is to endeavour to trace out this regression of consciousness
by self-analysis, casting off, one after another, the gross and
more subtle wrappings that clothe the eternal consciousness-"not-I"
"not-I", until we find ourselves stripped of form and
immersed, pure being, in an ocean of light. In vain have the mystics
endeavoured to make it clear to our blind eyes. They can only
affirm, "Thus have I found, and wish us God-speed in our
own adventure.
Mr Dunne divides his present
work into two main parts, the first stating the theory, the second
proving it by observed scientific facts. Another section is devoted
to more specific tests of the serial theory, in connection with
modern physics and relativity generally. In summing up, man, according
to serialism, must be "a self conscious observer employing
time as one of his terms of description because its regressive
character fits his needs and gives him the only kind of picture
he could regard as both rational and empirically true.
The universe, he declares, is
rational, "rational in everything save the ultimate observer
who makes the picture. He, with his self-consciousness and his
will and his dualism of psycho-physical outlook, is irrational;
but, no matter how far you may pursue him, you can never discover
this. For when you reach any observer in a series and put him
into the picture, he promptly transfers the irrationality to the
observer next behind him. Thus, rationality, in the philosophy
of an epistemologist, lies in an infinite regress. To a metaphysician
it lies in refusing to consider any subject-object relation whatsoever.
And that involves the denial of all knowledge obtained by experiment.
"The reader is at perfect
liberty to become a metaphysician and to say that the time picture
is all wrong. But he cannot then claim that the particular metaphysical
picture he may favour can be tested by experiment. Moreover,
that will not enable him to escape his immortality. For when
he talks about 'after' death, he is reverting to the time picture,
and in that picture he is immortal."
And with this we must perforce
part company with two of the most enthralling intellectual companions
that have come our way recently in the shape of books. The grace
and imaginative power of the one, and the keen scientific insight
of the other, though forming a vivid contrast, alike afford an
opportunity for those who delight in plunging into the depths
to do so to some purpose. And to what better end than that man
should be led to perceive that his intellect avails him only so
far, and that he. in his real self. is something greater than
the mind


Mandragora
By Philip S. Wellby, M.A.
"Whether for sweet
slumber and the heart's refreshment, or for madness and lechery,
it would appear to be equally potent," writes our Contributor,
Mr. Philip S. Wellby, M.A., in his appreciation of the work of
the Honorary Curator of the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons,
Mr. C. J. S. Thompson, whose monograph on the Mysterious Mandrake
Root forms the subject of the following article.
The old lore of the herbalist
attached strange properties to many common plants that grow in
field or fen, or by the wayside. It was supposed by some of the
early botanists, who linked their studies of Nature with the observation
of the starry skies, that to every plant and herb was assigned
a planetary influence, indicated by its form or growth or colouring,
thus bearing the signature of one planet or another, of the sun,
or of the moon. Some were found to be noxious and baneful in their
effects, and others charged with virtues for the assuagement of
bodily ills or the invigoration of the spirits. Amongst the plants
familiar to the apothecary or herbalist in ancient times none
was accounted of greater power for good or ill than the Mystic
Mandrake, the famous root Mandragora.
Mr. C. J. S. Thompson, Honorary
Curator of the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons, whose
life has been spent in exploring many curious by-ways in the study
of superstitions and beliefs, has gathered some astounding and
suggestive facts and fancies in investigating the history of the
mandrake, and the opinions which were held as to its powers and
properties.
Naturally shaped root of Black
Briony given to Professor Henry Balfour by a labourer of Headington,
Oxford, May 16, 1916
He believed it to be a mandrake,
and highly valued it for its magical potency. The root is sixteen
inches long. It shows the survival of the Mandrake tradition in
Oxfordshire at the present time.
(Reproduced by permission of
Professor Balfour, Pitt Rivers Museum, Oxford.)
For over three thousand years the mandrake has been regarded as
possessing strange powers. The old botanical name for it, Atropa
Mandragora, would seem to connect it with Atropos, the eldest
of the Parcæ "the arbiters of life and death of mankind".
Shaped in the likeness of a human being, its limbs embedded deeply
in the earth, it clung so tenaciously to the parent soil that
it could only be drawn from it with violence and as we learn,
not without danger to the predatory digger. Should such a one
injure the root he ran the risk of becoming demented and, even
his life might be lost in the very act of extraction The demon
embodied in this formidable plant gave vent to terrifying and
dreadful groans on its uprooting, so that the fearful root-hunters
had recourse to such methods as josephus, described. "They
dig," we read, "a trench about it till the hidden part
of the root be very small. Then they tie a dog to it, and when
the. dog tries hard to follow him that tied him, this root is
easily plucked up, but the dog dies immediately as if it were
instead of the man that would take the plant away; nor after this
need anyone be afraid of taking it into their hands."
According to Pliny, also quoted
by our author, there was another and more elaborate ceremony observed
in taking the root. "Persons when about to gather this plant
take every precaution not to have the wind blowing in their faces,
and after tracing three circles around it with a sword, turn towards
the west ' and dig it up. . . . There are some marvelous facts
related in connection with this plant. The root of it is said
to bear a strong resemblance to the organs of either sex. It is
but rarely found, but if a root resembling the male organ should
happen to fall in the way of a man it will ensure him woman's
love. Hence it is that Phaon, the Lesbian, was so passionately
beloved by Sapphic. Upon this subject, too, there have been numerous
reveries, not only on the part of the Magi but of Pythagorean
philosophers as well."
By close observers of Nature
it is admitted that plants and animals adapt themselves each to
their own place in the universal order, and, further, it will
occur that the character of a locality, whether as regards soil,
attitude or climate, determines the particular flora and fauna
to be found here or there. Not in the company of the wild-rose
and honeysuckle that yield their scent to the sunshine of noon
should Mandragora be sought, but in the deep-delled woodlands
amongst the lush undergrowth that bespeaks the quagmire. There,
at the hour between the dog and the wolf, may our search be rewarded;
for at that time the mandrake stirs in its secret bed and, exhaling
Circean odours, stretches its limbs in welcome of the falling
night.
To look at the pictures of the
mandrake is to be brought to wonder, and thence to sympathy with
the minds of those with whom the strange legends surrounding Mandragora
originated. We may recall the impressions of things magical in
childhood's days when a mis-shapen potato or freakishly moulded
stone captivated the imaginative sense and formed the basis for
a tale of wonder. Often and again has the mandrake caught the
fancy of poet or dramatist. Whether for sweet slumber and the
heart's refreshment, or for madness and lechery, it would appear
to be equally potent in its operation; as a talisman, an opiate,
or an aphrodisiac its power was recognised and admitted. From
Venus herself were especial virtues communicated to the charmed
root, so that sterility could be removed by its means, and, concocted
in a philtre, the passion of love could be stimulated. Whilst
a small dose in wine would relieve the deepest depression and
anxiety, taken in too strong a draught it would occasion delirium,
as Hippocrates the physician has testified
If we turn, as ever, to Shakespeare´s
plays we find that in the lovelorn ennui of separation from Antony,
Cleopatra says
Give me to drink Mandragora,
That I might sleep out this great gap of time
My Antony is away.
When Falstaff searches for
a fitting description of Justice Shallow, he finds the mandrake
to his purpose.
When a' was naked, he was for
all the world like a forked radish with a head fantastically
carved upon it with a knife... He was the very genius of famine,
yet lecherous as a monkey, and the whores called him - mandrake.
King Henry V, Part 11, Act
III,
There is yet another author to
whom the mandrake opened the door of creative fancy. In his story,
too good to be forgotten, When Pan was Dead he tells of a woodling
who slips between the bars of a convent, hungry to share the life
of comradeship. She found the sisterhood without knowledge of
happiness, and at night, when all were asleep, she crept from
cell to cell and gave them the wood-dream that should make them
happy. But, alas for their hearts the sweetness of life was causing
them to break. The abbess, sensing the unrest that spread through
the convent, imposed upon her charges the scourging of their bodies,
penance and hard discipline. Then the woodling bethought her of
her sisters in the wood, and sought their help. "They will
cry," she moaned; "ah, how they will cry! But my poor
sisters must be made happy; I must do it"
She ran down into the wood where
the mandrakes grew... One by one she caught them, and drew them
out of the ground; and the mandrakes groaned and shrieked as their
roots came to light of day. The nuns took the evening meal of
dry bread and bitter roots that the lay sister set before them,
and then went to their cells and lay down to sleep. The woodling
laughed, and threw off her habit, and stood up in only her brown
woodland skin and long flowing hair... Presently, for the root
of the mandrake had done its work, one of the cell doors slid
open and one fair nun ran out naked and silvery into the moonlight.
Another and another; they were all away, following the wood-dream
and the mandrake's cry, and the convent was deserted. ...The fair
sisterhood danced and laughed and sang, throwing up their arms
to the moon. The thin brown woodling leapt in and out of their
midst, kissing them all. When the mandrake madness had passed
in the grey misty morning, the nuns heard the convent bell and
crept back to their cells in shame and horror. The woodling went
down to the mandrake bed and dropped her face into the torn soil,
and was drawn down by the weight of her tears and became a mandrake
root, as these her sisters were. She knew she could never teach
the nuns to be happy, for "they love Pain", she said.
Curious, indeed, is the famous
herb Mandragora; powerful against enemies, a talisman to bring
riches and fortune, a drowsy drug to soothe pain, an elixir to
renovate the springs of passion. In the hands of the crafty and
malicious a baleful and pernicious thing. Whoever he may be who
would know of what the mandrake is, or who loves wonders and good
writing, he will find cause for gratitude to Mr. Thompson on coming
into possession of this book.
Uprooting a Mandrake.
From a manuscript of the sixteenth century in
the British Museum.


Astrology-Esoteric And Exoteric
By R. H. Naylor
Whether we lay stress on
the philosophical basis of Astrology, or on its practical application.
Whether the aspect of the Science which most appeals to us Is
the Esoteric or the Exoteric. The considered opinion of a practitioner
of the standing and experience of Mr. R. H. Naylor cannot be lightly
dismissed.
Personally I define Astrology
as that study which is concerned with the parallelism between
stellar phenomena and terrestrial life. Such a definition commits
no one to particular Astrological dogma. It does not postulate
that the stars have a definite influence, nor does it deny them
influence. It is not concerned with religious or ethical aspects
of the subject.
However, Astrology, like all
studies, has its specialised branches. In the present discussion
we are concerned with those aspects of Astrology which are generally
known as "Esoteric" and "Exoteric". Now, on
consulting my dictionary, I find the definitions which are set
down below:
Esoteric - Secret; for the initiated
only and intelligible only to them: from internal causes.
Exoteric - Such as is taught to the uninitiated; openly professed.
Larger dictionaries give more elaborated meanings, but the above
will serve for the moment.
It will be apparent that many
difficulties arise when we come to apply either of these terms
- in their full dictionary meanings - to Astrology. For instance,
if esoteric Astrology is "secret" how comes it to be
available in cheap handbooks? If it is for the initiated only,
then where are we to look for the initiated? Again, to apply "exoteric"
to an aspect of Astrology implies that it is a crude or elementary
side of the subject suitable to be taught to the more ignorant
and undeveloped
I regard the prefix "Esoteric"
or "Exoteric" in connection with Astrology as an extremely
fatuous qualification. As this article shows, there are, and must
be, specialised branches of Astrological research. Yet these two
terms do not wholly apply to any of them.
At this stage, it might be convenient
to turn aside for a moment and examine current Astrological opinion.
The average student who has outgrown his elementary stage and
who is soaked in current Astrological ideas would probably define
Esoteric and Exoteric thus:
ESOTERIC - that
side of Astrology which is concerned with and associated with
Theosophical and mystical, or pseudo mystical doctrines: with
occult Powers: with the spiritual side of things: with ethical
and aesthetic cults.
EXOTERIC - "fortune
- telling" Astrology, i.e., the application Astrology to
the so-called "practical" side of life - business affairs,
love affairs, gambling, betting, personal relationships, health
: the election of times and places for specific purposes, and
all the multiplex interests of ordinary daily life.
Like the dictionary definitions, these popular conceptions of
"esoteric" and "exoteric" are neither of them
quite correct. If the study of Astrology is to be split into two
paths it will be much more sensible to include under the term
"esoteric" all those aspects of the subject which could
not be understood by the average reader. Under "exoteric"
could properly be put popular Astrological tradition and methods:
in short, the side of the subject readily grasped by readers of
average education who have no special opportunity to study deeply.
It is easy for the matter-of-fact;
hundred per cent, hardheaded "he-man" to sneer at those
who, for want of a better term, are labelled "Esotericists".
The devotee of "esoteric" Astrology is, as a rule, very
earnest, very idealistic, and possesses that Divine Something
which is so essential to successful Astrological work.
On the other hand, some who are
devoted to "esoteric" Astrology are intolerant of those
who insist upon applying the Lore of the Stars to everyday use.
They look at (say) casting a horoscope for guidance in a business
deal in very much the same light as a hunting man would regard
shooting foxes.
In my opinion both are wrong.
To be sure the study of Astrology is capable of being split up
into diverse lines of specialised study, Indeed, specialisation
is essential : it is essential now and will become more and more
essential as the frontiers of knowledge are pushed forward.
For the devotees of so-called
Esoteric Astrology to regard their pet study as the only one that
matters, or for the Exoteric Astrologer lightly to dismiss Esoteric
Astrology, is foolish. Such an attitude is bad for Astrology :
it is bad for the astrologer. Either method of approach must necessarily
eventually merge into the other. For one's study of Astrology
to be all-embracing the field of view must include the sordidly
commonplace as much as the intellectually abstruse and ultra-spiritual.
It should be emphasised, even
at this stage of our survey, that some knowledge of elementary
mathematics, elementary astronomy and elementary physiography
is absolutely essential for the intelligent appreci ation of either
theory. The individual who claims the right to express an authoritative
opinion on either or any school of Astrological thought and who
has not these rudimentary qualifications is sadly in error. Ability
to absorb the rudiments of ordinary education, to grapple with
the ordinary problems of life, is just as necessary to Esoteric
Astrology as to Exoteric Astrology.
Further, it may be said that
the man or woman who makes a mess of his or her own life and affairs
cannot be a good Astrologer. If Astrology stands for anything
at all, it stands for guidance and strength.
The earliest known Astrological
instructions and records came down to us from Nineveh and Babylon.
In the British Museum you may see many hundreds of clay tablets
(translations of which are before me at this moment) on which
are set down a curious jumble of Astrological lore. At the same
time as these long-forgotten Astrologers were working on the mud
flats of Chaldea, other schools of Astrological thought had their
origins in China, India, Africa and the Mediterranean countries.
Partly owing to the ravages of time, partly owing to continual
wars, and partly owing to the destructive efforts of Christian
missionaries and others, the greater part of this early Astrological
knowledge is lost to us. Some of it may be - and I hope will be
- unearthed and re-constructed by archaeologists.
So far as the Western world is
concerned, current Astrological knowledge was summed up in the
Tetrabiblos of Claudius Ptolemy. This is an exhaustive treatise
on the various branches of Astrology and some of the astronomical
factors concerned therein. After a checkered career the text finally
became available to English readers.
In the Greek, Roman and later
Egyptian empires, Astrology flourished. The Roman authorities
finally took up the attitude that the study of Astrology was permissible
to all, but that the professional practice of Astrology was against
the law. In Egypt and the East generally, the study and practice
of Astrology seems to have been encouraged rather than otherwise.
The .early Church Fathers took up very much the same attitude
as the rulers of Rome, i.e., that Astrological teachings might
be veritable, but that they were harmful to the common people.
The interested student could spend many hours following out curious
arguments on the point in the writings of the early Christian
writers.
There were, of course, many classical
works on Astrology and related subjects, some of which have come
down to us. But all these writings alike contain a curious mixture
of what we now call superstition, with some science, a certain
amount of pure Astrology, and much reference to alleged Astrological
processes which can only be described as divination.
The choicest attentions of the
Inquisition were reserved for the luckless students of Astrology
and the related sciences. Hence Astrological knowledge was almost
stamped out in Europe. It raised a feeble voice in Restoration
and later times, but in the late Victorian ERA it was reduced
to a shadow of its former self.
At this time the school of Astrology
that we call "Esoteric" -which was already in being
as an undercurrent even in Greek times-began to make itself manifest.
True the mediaeval alchemists and occultists were familiar with
the subject, but their writings were seldom available to the mass.
However, along came Mr. Alan
Leo - a particularly clever business man - who had the necessary
financial resources to cultivate his hobby - the esoteric side
of Astrology. Mr. Leo took his cue from Hiram Butler, author of
a work called Solar Biology.
Both Butler and Leo were very
sincere believers in a cult which was a mixture of theosophy,
mysticism, religion, pure Astrology and a curious "uplift"
tendency of the Victorian world. In fact, Leo may be regarded
as the founder of the modem "Esoteric" school. Most
existing writings on the subject owe their inspiration to him
and his associates.
It would be impossible in the
scope of a short article like this adequately to describe the
teachings of Esoteric Astrology.
Briefly, Esoteric Astrology postulates-
That the human mind is capable
of understanding the Divine Plan and, therefore, to some extent
of understanding the scheme of the Universe in general and the
earth in particular.
This being granted, it postulates
that the Solar System is a kind of evolutionary school. A great
intelligence being incarnated in the Sun : lesser intelligences
in the planets and their satellites.
It is assumed that the individual
entities that make up collective organic life on the earth and
elsewhere are passing through a vast plan of evolutionary reincarnation.
It is difficult to follow the
next stage & esoteric doctrine. I have never been clear whether
the Esotericists regard the planets as having definite influences
or whether they are to be regarded merely as symbols. Anyhow,
the Esotericists derive a vast amount of pleasure and no little
information and help from the linking up of Astrological factors
with the above doctrines.
The mind trained in orthodox
science would, of course, at once reject ninety per cent of their
postulations. This fact need not discourage the enquirer; for
Exoteric Astrology, as we know, it would be similarly unfortunate.
In Exoteric Astrology there is
the same deplorable muddle. The average dabbler in Exoteric Astrology
regards the planets as:
Very definite forces whose effects
can be estimated both as regards point of time and degree of power
(See the writings of the late Mr. Sutcliffe in Modern Astrology
and elsewhere.)
Or he regards the stellar and
planetary configurations merely as symbols to be read by methods
coming down to us from ancient times. (See the writings of the
late Mr. Gorn Old, "Sepharial", and others.)
In my opinion the Astrology of
the future will include what is good in both these schools. It
will link up with orthodox science. Or one might more correctly
say orthodox science will ultimately absorb and claim as its own
the fundamentals of Astrology. Those fundamentals will then have
the advantage of being developed by the vast network of organised
research which exists in our laboratories and universities. It
will be elaborated out of all countenance and linked up with instrumental
research and observation, both astronomical and physio-psychological.
Weighing carefully my words,
I affirm that in the unexplored deeps of Astrological doctrine
lies the key to many of the problems of present-day and future
science.

Sleep And The Nature Of Man
By E. C. Merry
The second of a series of three
articles based on a large number of published and unpublished
lecture-courses by the late Dr. Rudolf Steiner. In view of the
extremely occult nature of the subject dealt with, the writer
begs that adverse criticism may be withheld, or at least tempered,
until the reader has been able to acquire some knowledge of the
many-sidedness and immense scope of Dr. Steiner's life work In
occultism, externally represented by many published works and
several thousands of unprinted lectures. - The Author.
In the modern age there is little understanding
of the nature of the spiritual principle in man. It has become
fairly general to speak of man as having body, soul, and mind.
The word "spirit" is not often used. This is a very
remarkable symptom of our age, for it points to the inability
to form a conception of the Spirit.
This inability has developed
in human thought since the ninth century, and there is an historical
(and occult) reason for it, though the fact has been passed by
almost entirely unnoticed. "Spirit" has become something
entirely vague in experience, though it may be defined in a form
of words; and the highest human attribute is considered to-day
to be the capacity which places man as a Thinker on a higher level
than the animals. The "soul" is also, to the average
enquirer, something vague, which may or may not be immortal, and
which to many is merely the totality of the inner effects-reacting
upon the "mind"of the physical tendencies and inheritance.
Naturally, soul and mind (or spirit, when it is considered) are
capable of bearing all kinds of philosophical or theological definitions.
But to the average human being of the present day they are little
more than words. Therefore, to 'call the soul the "astral
body" or astral organisation, and the spirit the "Ego"
is at first sight, only to use another set of words, equally vague.
Occult science gives them names, because they spring from the
real causes of their being
The physical body, as physical
body - in the sense in which it is usually and erroneously regarded
as representing the whole man - is said by Occultists to be invisible
so long as it is alive. This is because it cannot be said to exist
at all, as a living entity, apart from the etheric body. It is
only the corpse, which is the actual physical body.
, The etheric body is a "body
of formative forces", which is the bearer of life. It is
invisible except to the clairvoyant, though the experiments of
Moritz Benedict and others have made it partly visible under certain
conditions. It is slightly larger than the material form, and
permeates it everywhere, and contains the forces that mould the
physical matter and hold it together in the form designed for
it in super-physical regions of being. From the material aspect-if
one can here use the expression the etheric organisation is a
kind of super-physical basis for the fluids in the physical body;
but from the more spiritual aspect it is connected with the person's
fundamental character, with the forces of Thinking, and of Memory.
In it inheres the sense of Time. The plant possesses a physical
and an etheric body, and through the latter it responds to the
influences of the seasons of the year in its growth and decay.
At death, the human etheric body slowly dissolves into its related
"cosmic ether", and the material body falls into decay.
During life, the etheric body must always be present.
The "astral body" is
a much less easily understood term; for the word "body"
is generally associated with something physical and of definite
form, and this is more readily conceivable in the case of the
etheric body. The astral body also has a form, but is in a constant
state of change. It denotes the totality of all that we ordinarily
connect with our life of feeling. It is in reality the vehicle
of the soul. From the material standpoint again if one may be
pardoned the paradox - it is the supersensible basis of the nervous
system, and is associated with the rhythmic functions - the rhythm
of breathing and circulation. From the non-material aspect it
embraces all emotions, passions, desires, longings, sympathies
and antipathies; and we know how strongly these are able to influence
the rhythms of the body, It is also the "sheath" for
the indwelling spirit, or Ego; and this can be grasped if we realise
how our "I" is bound up with our life of sympathies
and antipathies, and how through these, as it were, the "I"
uses the physical and etheric bodies for its purposes of living
in the physical world. Thus the soul is really there as a mediator
between the activity of the spi t and the life-processes ri of
the body. Also, it may be regarded as threefold-as a sentient
principle from the side of the body, as an intellectual principle
from the side of the spirit, and as a conscious principle in its
totality.
After death it passes with the
spirit or Ego into a state of extended consciousness, and becomes
the field of self-knowledge and purification. It is discarded
when the spirit enters into higher regions of the spiritual world.
The astral body is the vehicle
for our conscious life because it is the basis of the nervous
system, but it acts in such a way while in the material body that
it tends to destroy; it battles against the life-giving forces
of the etheric body; and in this conflict the "pain"
of consciousness is awakened. Through the astral body we are adjusted
to the sense of Space. The animal has a physical body, an etheric
body, and also an astral body. But the animal's relation to Space
and to the Stars is different from the human, as the vital centres
lie in the horizontal plane. The animal has no Ego that is individually
incarnated, but possesses a "Group-Ego" or Group-Soul.
One should really speak of each
of these three higher principles, etheric body, astral body, and
Ego, as "organisations", for they have respectively
definite relation to all the organs and functions of the body
as a whole, and are "dovetailed" into one another in
quite specific ways.
The Ego is like a kind of master-organisation,
whose occasional failure to permeate the other principles in the
right way gives rise to mental and physical deformity. The upright
position of Man in space is due to the spiritual force of the
fully incarnated Ego-principle. The perfection of the larynx in
Man, and its presence as the organ of intelligent speech, is connected
with the upright position. Walking, speaking, and thinking are
three divine-spiritual attributes brought into manifestation during
the successive steps of the incarnation of the Ego during childhood.
There has to be a definite balance maintained between all four
principles in man, not only for perfect physical well-being, but
also for moral and mental and psychic health. The occult investigation
of this fact (with other related facts) has been made by Dr. Steiner
the basis for a new system of Therapy.
In the long and intricate history
of the evolution of humanity, Occult Science shows how the physical,
or mineral, elements and their laws were the first to appear;
then the etheric, or "life", then the astral, or "sentient
conscious life", and last the informing spirit or Ego; and
it teaches that this comparatively simple fourfold condition is
destined to be changed and transmuted into something far higher
in the course of ages, by the Ego itself. The work of the Ego
for this present age lies in its endeavours to permeate completely
the other principles, and attain full self-consciousness and freedom.
For those who undertake an occult
development, the first stages represent a catharsis, or purification,
of the astral body and its sympathies and antipathies; and the
final stages represent a completed transformation, by the Ego,
of astral body, etheric body, and physical body. This is what
must take place eventually for all members of the human family
that do not fall out by the way; but the Initiate seeks to accomplish
the task more rapidly, so that he (or she) may become a "leader
of the race towards home".
To anyone accustomed only to
modern evolutionary theories, all this must seem unreal and fantastic;
and such feelings would no doubt be justified if the statements
of Occultism could not be related to known facts. But in the anatomical,
biological and other scientific domains everything that has here
been said has been elaborated and deepened in such a way that
it can throw new light on many great problems, not only in connection
with man, but with all the other kingdoms of Nature.
As a rule we go through life
with very little appreciation of the extraordinary phenomenon
of sleep. We know that it is recuperative, and that we need it.
We seldom realise the mystery of the processes of falling asleep
and waking out of sleep, nor pause to consider how remarkable
is the continuity of our being in spite of the rhythmic breaks
and total loss of consciousness that occur during every twenty-four
hours.
How is it that every morning
we pick up the threads of yesterday? - in some respects finding
them continuing in a straight line, as it were, and in other respects
finding they have taken a turning in a different direction as
though manipulated by a superior consciousness in our absence.'
And yet they are all there; and we are there, to all intents and
purposes the same as yesterday. When we have decisions to make,
how often we say we should like "to sleep on it"! Why
is this? What tells us that the night brings new light on our
problems?
Physical science is able to describe
the wear and tear of the nervous system and of the brain during
the day, and accounts on purely physical grounds for their recuperation
by rest. But the occult scientist sees in sleeping and waking
the rhythmic adjustment of the soul and spirit, the astral body
and the Ego, with the surrounding spiritual world. Consciousness,
which arises through the astral body, tends to destroy the "life"
processes. Less sensitive and less intelligent people tend to
have more robust physical bodies, generally speaking. Thus we
must recognise a certain grouping of the four principles into
physical body and etherical body on the one hand, and astral body
and Ego on the other. In sleep, the two latter are "lifted
out" of the two former; and the etheric or vital formative
forces appear as though shone upon by the soul and spirit-like
a region of Plants warmed and vivified by the sun. Sleep is a
spiritual "day". On waking, the sun sets, and a spiritual
night is upon us while we use all our capacities in close co-operation
together in carrying out our daily life.
The astral body and Ego, when
they rise into soul-and-spiritual surroundings, have experiences;
and largely experiences connected with the past and future incarnations;
but these experiences are not now communicated to the waking consciousness,
and the present-day man remains utterly unconscious of them. Dreams
are not a replica of these actual experiences, but they often
present a disguised reflection of them. The sleeping etheric body
is still filled with the pictures of thought impressions, which
live on during sleep in a kind of independence; and dreams take
place either during the stage of falling asleep or of awakening.
Dreams experienced during the former stage have an entirely different
character, according to occultism, from those experienced during
the latter. Most of our more vividly remembered dreams are the
waking ones. They arise when the astral body and Ego are returning,
and a kind of conflict takes place between the spiritual content
of the astral body and the physical thought-images in the etheric.
The etheric body is, as has been said, the builder of the physical
body; but it can only build correctly in that it receives ever
and again the archetypal models for its task which are absorbed
by the astral body during sleep, and communicated to it. This
is the recuperative power of the astral body. But in waking life
these "models" become spoilt by physical sense-perceptions;
and this causes fatigue.
Occult development, when carried
out on the right lines, eventually results in the attainment of
"being awake in deep sleep"; and becoming aware of the
life of the soul and spirit in spiritual worlds. In ancient times
there was always a certain degree of consciousness in sleep; but
with the deeper penetration of soul and spirit into the physical
body in waking life, this was lost.
It was this power of being conscious
in sleep which gave earlier humanity its realisation of a life
after death, and before birth. The true Initiate of to-day obtains
his accurate knowledge of the life after death through his capacity
to awaken, in the astral body, a consciousness of what the Ego
experiences in sleep. It is, therefore, a question of seeking
to create "organs" of perception in the soul, which
can be done by meditation and catharsis. Without the latter-which
was epitomised in ancient Greece, in the saying: "O man know
thyself" - an awakening in sleep would be utterly shattering.
A definite series of experiences
is passed through by the soul and spirit while the body sleeps,
which is a kind of miniature of what takes place after death;
but this cannot be dealt with here. For the moment it will be
sufficient to hold fast to this idea of the passing out and returning
of the soul and spirit, while the physical and etheric bodies
lie in-the "green pastures" in deep unconsciousness,
and are refreshed by the "still waters" that give it
life. One of the great mysteries of sleep is that the entrance
into it is always accompanied by unconscious fear the fear of
abandoning oneself to the abyss which separates the physical from
the spiritual world. But this fear is a force which, paradoxically,
works beneficently in the organic secretions of the body. The
Will-conceived in its highest, most divine form, as creative-is
hidden in the depths of our organism, and is inherent in the whole
system of metabolism; but as nothing exists save as the opposition
of polarities, it is also destructive in its nature; and out of
this dual essence arises the possibility of Good and Evil. Though
fear is there, the morality with which the Ego is able to permeate
the body in waking life, and its power of maintaining a certain
contact with it in sleep, makes it possible for the destructive
element in the Will-Evil, or the animal tendencies-not to prevail.
(Cf. the twenty-third Psalm: "The Lord is my Shepherd,"
etc.)
Again and again in the study
of genuine Occult Science, we come to a sense of the importance
of this spiritual principle, the Ego; and can feel that its loss
would expose the human being to degeneration, and sever him from,
the possibility of carrying out his true destiny.
So far as the present writer
has been able to ascertain, Spiritualist literature gives no indication
of any communications having been received descriptive of a life
before birth. Also, the references to reincarnation are comparatively
sparse, and usually on lines suggesting that it does not take
place.
It is impossible, on the face
of it, to build up a reasonable doctrine of spiritual survival
if its foundation rests merely upon the event of physical birth
as the starting-point for an endless non-material future after
death.
On the other hand a good deal
is said by Spiritualists about the activity of the soul in sleep.
But here there is much confusion. The terms etheric body and astral
body are often used quite indiscriminately, or as though they
were one and the same thing. One or the other word is used to
denote the vehicle by means of which the nightly activities of
the soul are undertaken. The activities usually described in "psychic"
literature consist of helping - in one form or another - those
who are in trouble or sickness; and the' surrounding conditions
are generally, as in the descriptions of the life after death,
pictured as almost precisely similar to the surrounding conditions
of earthly activities. Also, one misses in these writings any
appreciation of degrees in the state of sleep, though stress is
laid on degrees or stages in the life after death. But a merely
naive recognition of sleep as analogous with death carries no
one any further.
Generally speaking, the life
of sleep is accepted by everybody merely as something belonging
to the "matter of course" occurrences of physical existence,
and the mystery and wonder of it seldom come into consideration.
But the mystery of it is great. And it is the key which is capable
of unlocking the greatest secrets of life and death and reincarnation.


The Sacred Bull
By W. G. Raffée, A.R.C.A.
In the present
study of the significance of the Sacred Bull, which is in the
nature of a sequel to the article on Bull Fights which appeared
in our June issue, our contributor, who draws his material from
an quarters of the globe, traces In a manner both interesting
and illuminative the history and significance of this universal
symbol.
From Crete comes the legend of
the Minotaur; probably, also, that of Europa and the Bull. Numerous
votive models of bulls have been found at Mycenie, one grave alone
containing fifty six, many bearing the sacred double-axe. Sacred
horns appear on most Mycenxan altars, and rhyta, vessels in the
shape of bulls' horns, seem to have been used in sacrificial rites.
Evans suggests that the palace which he excavated was the famous
"labyrinth", for the plan is really complex. But Dr.
A. B. Cook believes that the labyrinth was a dancing place, where
a dance was performed to symbolise solar movements, performed
by the ruling prince of Knossos, wearing a bull-mask, because
the sun was represented in Crete as a bull. The sacrifices, he
thinks, not only of a bull but of youths and maidens (to the Minotaur)
are connected with the annual divine renewal of power of the sun-king.
Certainly Crete was a great centre
of bull symbolism. A wall painting from Knossos shows male and
female toreadors; one leaps over the back of the bull while others
move round the animal. A fresco from Tiryns (now preserved in
Athens) shows a female acrobat on the back of a running bull.
On a marble relief found at Smyrna, horsemen pursuing bulls are
seen, one on the back of a bull, holding the horns.
Most of the archaeological evidence
for Cretan mythology was excavated by Sir Arthur Evans from the
Palace of Knossos, in the Island of Crete; but here again the
connected symbolic theme is illustrated rather than revealed in
his writings. (Evans Arthur, The Palace of Minos at Knossos -
4 Volumes, London 1928)
In Egypt, Osiris was regularly
identified with the Sacred Bull, Asar Ameshet Apis, of Memphis
(who trod upon his enemies) and also with the Bull Mnevis of Heliopolis.
Although the BullApis was worshipped with much ceremony as a god,
the sacred books commanded that he should not live beyond the
stipulated time. According to Plutarch, this period was one quarter
of a century, after which the Bull was drowned in a holy spring,
or the Nile. Inscriptions recently uncovered show, however, that
some of these Bulls lived more than twenty-six years.
Of the earlier and genuine mysteries,
less information is available, but the Feast of Attis certainly
included a baptism of blood and a sacramental meal as part of
the rites. The gold crowned novice descended into a deep pit covered
by a grating. Over this a bull, garlanded with flowers and bearing
golden symbols on its brow, was stabbed with a consecrated spear.
The hot blood gushed over the novice below, who caught it on his
garments until he emerged clad in reeking scarlet, to receive
the applause of his fellows as one who had been "born again
to eternal life", one whose sins had been washed away beneath
the torrent of fresh life in the blood. It is not difficult to
connect this ritual with the latter-day symbols of official Christianity,
with its "washing in the blood of the Lamb' to "take
away the sins of the world".
Nevertheless, this ritual of
the taurobolium, or actual baptism of blood, is undoubtedly a
superstitious degradation of the higher spiritual sacrifice of
Mithras as the Divine Bull. This rite, though sometimes used by
worshippers of Mithras, was known to refer to the Great Mother
and Attis. It is pretty certain that the rite has not the slightest
connection with the inner mysteries, none of which would use blood
in this fashion; moreover, inferior priests, having submitted
to it, openly bragged of having been "regenerated".
One inescapable fact, however,
is that the early transition of the Christian symbol from the
Good Shepherd (or the Reigning King), to the tortured martyr nailed
as a criminal to the Roman crucifix, degrades the once-great symbol
of the Easter Bull whose blood magically purified and revivified
the Earth. The Church has literally taken the god and slaughtered
him, so that magically and vicariously he becomes the scapegoat
for human sins; while still asserting that he is a man become
divine. Hence the Christian Easter festival is a mere caricature
of a most sacred and divine symbol; brought down by crude and
uninspired realism to mean almost the opposite of what was first
intended. In short, it is no better than the Roman cow sacrifice.
The great contrast between the
Bull ritual of Dionysus and that of Mithras is that Dionysus himself
is the Sacred Bull by the magic of transubstantiation, and is
slain, while Mithras slays the Bull. The difference is explained
by the different purposes of the rite which symbolises the creative
power, as applied to varying ends. The coming of Dionysus is the
annual renewal of the Earth at the vernal equinox : it is the
never-ending creation dramatised at the Zodiacal moment of its
apparent repetition at that time and place. Mithras, however,
slays the Bull "before the foundation of the world"
that the world itself may be created by its sacrifice; and yet
again, the Persian god prefigures the Christian "plan of
salvation" by the death of the Bull-at the hands of the god,
much as the sacrifices demanded by Jehovah so that "mankind
shall not perish".
So, says Frazer, quoting Cumont:
In the belief of his worshippers
"the sacrifice of the divine bull was in truth the great
event in the history of the world, the event which stands alike
at the beginning of the ages and at the consummation of time,
the event which is at once the source of the earthly life and
the life eternal. We can therefore see why among all the sacred
imagery of the mysteries the place of honour was reserved for
the representation of this supreme sacrifice, and why always and
everywhere it was exposed in the apse of the temples to the adoration
of the worshippers!" On the minds of the worshippers seated
in the religious gloom, of the subterranean temple, the mournful
scene of the slaughter of the bull, dimly discerned at the far
end of the sanctuary, was doubtless well fitted to impress solemn
thoughts, not only of the great sacrifice which in days long gone
by had been the source of life on earth, but also of that other
great sacrifice, still to come, on which depended all their hopes
of a blissful immortality.
Here, the Sacred Bull has several
meanings. He is creative power to form the world; he is also creative
power to form the soul in the world; he is the secret motive power
alike on Nivritii marga and Pravritti marga, but in different
forms.
H.P.Blavatsky, writing in Isis
on the Zodiac, gives some suggestive allusions to the ritual of
the Bull:
Kain, presiding over the Taurus
(Bull) of the Zodiac, is also very suggestive. Taurus belongs
to the earthy trigon, and in connection with this sign it will
not be amiss to remind the student of an allegory from the Persian
Avesta. The story goes that Ormazd produced a being source and
type of all the universal beings - called LIFE, or Bull in the
Zend. Ahriman (Cain) kills this being (Abel) from the seed of
which (Seth) new beings are produced. Abel, in Assyrian, means
son, but in Hebrew, , it means something ephemeral, not long lived,
valueless and also a "Pagan idol", as Kain means a Mermaic
statue (a pillar, the symbol of generation).
In a footnote we are told also
that "Apollo was also Abelius or Bel".
The Sacred Bull was, in Assyria,
a leading symbol, together with the ram, the lion and the sphinx.
A. H. Layard is definite on the symbolical position, if not the
full meaning, of the great human-headed bulls so often sculptured
at the portals of the palaces.
I have [says be] ventured to
suggest the idea which these singular forms were intended to convey-the
union of the greatest intellectual and physical powers; but certainly
their position with reference to other symbolical figures would
point to an inferiority in the celestial hierarchy ... even the
eagle-headed figure [is] the vanquisher of the human headed lion
and bull, [and] ministering to the king.
The sacrifice of the Sacred Bull
should never be confused with the almost diametrically opposed
ritual of the sacrifice of the Sacred Cow, more especially in
Europe. Among the Romans, such a sacrifice was made to the Earth
goddess Tellus for bountiful crops on the fifteenth of April.
The victim, Frazer tells us, was a cow in calf, one being killed
in each of the thirty wards of the city of Rome.
The unborn calves were torn out
and burned to ashes, which, mixed with horse-blood and bean-stalks,
made a "fumigation" material to purify the people at
the Shepherd's Festival of the Parilia, six days later, at the
Temple of Vesta. This was a "fertility" sacrifice. In
Rome itself this rite was performed on the Vatican Hill, in the
sanctuary of the Phrygian goddess close to the site of the modem
church of St. Peter. Numerous inscriptions relating to the rites
were found when excavations were made for the enlargement of that
edifice in 1608 and 1609. Other inscriptions found in Gaul and
in Germany show that provincial sanctuaries copied this central
temple. That the rite was definitely connected with fertility
and reproduction is proved by allusions to the generative organs
of the animals; while one of the titles of Attis was "The
most fruitful one". The Easter festival of the Christian
Church was based on these older customs, which it could in no
way eradicate but endeavoured to transform to its own purpose.
The sacrifice of virility by
men in the rites of Cybele was so drastic that it is not unnatural
that a sacrifice by substitute should be sought. Not all men desired
so realistically to emulate the emasculation. of Attis in subjection
to the superstition of the exoteric priesthood on the Day of Blood,
when they "wept for Tammuz". It lingered on into modern
times only with the fanatical skoptse of Russia.
The resurrection of the god,
the opening of his tomb, the sudden change from sadness to gladness,
was marked for the day of the vernal equinox. On this twenty-fifth
day of March, the Roman Festival of joy (Hilaria) took place,
degenerating into the utmost degree of license over two days and
nights.
That part of the rite still followed
in the modem bullfight, the waving of a red cloth or banner before
the bull, is variously explained. The modem oculist briefly asserts
that an animal, gazing all day at green vegetation which remains
motionless, is worried and excited by a brilliant patch of the
directly contrasting colour moving jerkily before its eyes in
a strange place. This fact may in part explain some of the animal's
physical excitement. It is equally clear that the original ritual
cannot have been identical: that the object held before the bull
was as sacred as the lance which despatched him.
Knowing that the bull symbolised
creative energy, that it was necessary to excite him, we can easily
see that the symbolic object used must have had a female significance;
and that red was its colour., The same object played a prominent
part in Hebrew ritual, and is known as part of the solar rites.
The womb of Ked, or the Dolphin form of tabernacle, bore coverings
with symbols of Sun-worship. The inner side was a design of the
Zodiac; outside were dolphin skins, and then sheepskins dyed red
to imitate flesh, as "the curtain of the holy temple".
Through this emerged the priest at the end of the rites, when
he was ritually "born again". The red covering of the
Bull-god's opposing symbol was gradually used instead of the symbol
it at first veiled; undoubtedly one of its several meanings was
"the blood that is the life".
With the description of Shiva,
given in the vision of Ezekiel, we have four symbolic faces: The
Eagle (John), the Bull (Luke), the Lion (Mark), and the Angel
(Matthew). This Bull, Nardi or Nandi, the vahan of Shiva, is identical
with the Egyptian Apis and the Zoroastrian Bull created by Ormazd
and killed by Ahriman. Hence the bull is everywhere the emblem
of worldly or physical Life, in every religious system. And it
is at the same time, by inversion, the destroyer of the spiritual
life. Reading the symbol depends on the polarisation of the creative
energy.
It may be of value to observe
the position of the bull glyphs and symbols in alphabet and Zodiac.
In the ancient versions, the bull was the first form in each.
All the letter symbols were forms: the vowels - the life - had
to be read into them according to the sense of the phrase and
its connections. It is probable that the twenty-two letters of
the Hebrew alphabet at one time symbolised the ten Sephira and
the twelve phases of the Zodiac, five masculine and five feminine
with two dualities or balances. None of these was to be taken
literally, or, indeed, to be read rigidly, but only in a "light-handed"
interpretation.
Bull and Cow, creative
power and creative fertility, are two fundamental and archetypal
ideas with several interpretations; hence their appearance and
constant repetition, even in different associations, is not at
all surprising. Errors inevitably arise from their literal interpretation;
in limiting the controlling idea by the temporal symbols. Art
demands that ideas shall be expressed in forms having some rhythmic
and ideal consonance; this harmony is the basis of what we call
beauty. With simple peoples, their range of forms is somewhat
limited, and even though a fundamental idea be grasped or, more
probably, dimly remembered, it must be expressed.in some form
that is more or less familiar. Tribes having no cattle, therefore,
will not use the bull glyph: for them no physical reality can
mirror the inner truth. Thus, like the hairy Ainus of the northern
islands of Japan, they may accept another analogous symbol in
their life, the bear. Consequently the bear symbol performs for
the Ainus what the Bull did for the Cretans. Bears appear everywhere
in their art and ritual on all kinds of objects.

My Sister H. P. Blavatsky
Written by Madame Jelihovsky, but unfortunately the title page
and one other is missing
...continued...
...travelling, for daring and
bold enterprises and for indulgence in strong emotions. She ignored
authority; always self-reliantly making her own way, choosing
independent goals, despising the stipulations of society and forcefully
removing obstacles which restricted her freedom. At the age of
seventeen she voluntarily married a man old enough to be her father,
and after a few months left him unhesitatingly; went away, no
one knew where, and disappeared for nearly ten years, so that
for a long time her relatives did not know of her whereabouts.
To her intimates she confessed
that she had married N. V. Blavatsky[3] merely to be free from
the control of her guardians.
Most of her youth Blavatskys
spent outside Europe. She lived several years in Northern India
studying languages, Sanscrit literature and those abstract sciences
for which Raja Yoga[4] is so famous and for which she later had
to suffer; her too fervent followers proclaiming her a magician,
thus giving her enemies to accuse her of deception and to call
her a charlatan.
Finding herself lonely without
her relatives, Blavatsky returned to Russia in 1859, after ten
years' wanderings. First she visited me, her sister, and our father
in the Pskov province, and then our mother's relatives in Tiflis.
She returned from her wanderings a person possessing mediumistic
powers which immediately commenced to display themselves and to
astonish and startle everybody around. She proved to be the strongest
medium, a state which she very much despised later, tl-dnking
that it was humiliating for human dignity and very bad for the
health. Later on, her psychological powers developing completely
she was enabled to subordinate to her control all external manifestations
of mediumism, but at the age of twenty-seven these powers manifested
against her will, very seldom obeying her. She was surrounded
by constant rappings and movements, the origin and meaning of
which she could not explain. "I don't know what has happened
to me", she said, "some power has got into me, I have
brought it from America. It is not sufficient that everything
around me raps and rings, but the things move and rise without
sense or need. Also they sometimes manifest very intelligently
during conversation with their rappings, answer mental questions
and even guess thoughts. What devilry is it
At that time the American theories
brought over and practised by Home in St Petersberg were well
known to everybody in Russia, but very few Russians had the opportunity
actually to see demonstrations of mediumism. Blavatsky's astonishing
powers made such a great noise in Pskov that even now, thirty
years later, the old inhabitants remember her short visit there.
The sensible answering of mental questions was what surprised
people most.
Such complete intelligence on
the part of the powers working through H.P.B. even then gained
her supporters among the hardest sceptics. It impressed the people
much more than the moving of objects or her constantly seeing
"ghosts",her descriptions of which proved to be exact
portraits of dead people whom she had never known but whom the
people present always recognised from her descriptions. Very soon
Pskov and partly St. Petersburg and, later on, the whole Caucasus
started to talk of the wonders which surrounded H.P.B. People
came to have a look at her as if she herself were a won der. She
was bombarded with letters, requests and most absurd demands which
she good-naturedly fulfilled; allowing herself to be bound, to
be laid on soft cushions and all measures to be taken to prevent
any deceit. But all these measures did not stop the moving, rapping
and ringing around her: these powers were continually displayed,
even during her sleep and unconsciousness in illness. The talk
grew immensely, especially when the "ghosts" helped
to find a murderer in the surroundings of my village, Rogodevo,
in Povorjevsky, where we were spending the summer. The "ghosts"
without hesitation named the criminal, also the village and even
the house where he was hiding, to the astonished police officers,
who immediately rode there, found the murderer and arrested him.
H.P. recalled this epoch in later
years with terror and contempt of her helpless and uncontrollable
mediumism. After several years she completely subordinated to
her will these powers, the pernicious nature and evil origin of
which she explained in her works, with full confidence in her
judgment, but possibly being wrong.[5]
Next year Blavatsky went to Tiflis.
On her way, at a church service at Sadonsk, she was recognised
by the Most Reverend Isidor, former Exarch of Georgia, and later
Metropolitan of St. Petersburg, who came to Sadonsk on his way
from Kiev. He had known Blavatsky in her youth in Tiflis and he
sent a servant to her with an invitation to visit him. Isidor
enquired how and where she had travelled, where she was going
now, etc. He very soon noticed the phenomena which surrounded
her and was deeply interested in them; he questioned her about
them, put mental questions, and, after receiving sensible A answers,
was still more surprised. When saying good-bye, he blessed her
and said words regarding her exceptional gifts, words which always
remained very dear to her, as the opinion on her gift of a high
priest of the Orthodox Church. He said: "Every power comes
from God, you need not feel dismayed if you do not abuse this
power given to you. There are many undiscovered powers in nature.
Many of them are not known to man, but it is not forbidden to
discover and to use them. Man will gradually obtain control over
these powers and will be able to apply them usefully for humanity.
God bless you in all your kind and good deeds.
H.P.B. stayed in Trans-Caucasus
(where her youth was spent) four years. Her talented and versatile
nature steadily demanded new activities, new interests and occupations.
It was impossible for her to be satisfied with every-day environment
and the colourless life which was sufficient for most women. She
was ever looking for varied goals as a fish looks for water or
a wild bird for the open, boundless air for its flight. She roamed
about constantly looking for something, trying to escape to the
open world from ties or chains which restricted her. Ever dissatisfied,
she started one thing after another and, disappointed again and
again in her hopes, put aside enterprises she had begun and began
to pursue a fresh attraction. This longing for something unknown,
for some abstract thing which she could not grasp, as well as
the sense of some task which she was called upon to fulfil, but
which was not clear to herself at the beginning, ceased only when
her interest was attracted by Theosophy. Then she stopped suddenly
like a wandering ship which at last finds a good harbour and confidently
drops her anchor. She stayed faithful to that teaching all her
life; she gave her health, her time and her soul to it, recognising
in it at last the task for which she was destined and in which
she seemed to find a goal worthy of all her efforts: propagating
among the peoples of all classes and races belief in the unity
of spiritual powers in humanity and in the knowledge of Theosophy,
the most ancient religion of the intellect. "Ideals and religion
are lost nearly everywhere : pseudo-science has destroyed them.
People of our age demand scientific proofs of the immortality
of the soul. The ancient, esoteric Science-Religion of Aum, so
called by the fathers of the Orthodox Church (from the Sanscrit
root of the word Aum-the highest power), will give it to them."
But all this came much later.
In her youth, H.P.B. roved from place to place, from one occupation
to another, never finding any satisfaction. It is necessary to
take into consideration the fact that in those times women's activities
were not as comprehensive as they are now, but Blavatsky did not
follow routine, and understood how to conquer such obstacles.
She was very skilful with her hands and was a real artist in needlework
and at making beautiful flowers : for a while she had a shop of
her own which was a great success. Later she did business on a
larger scale, rafting walnut-spunk over the frontier, for which
purpose she moved over to Mingrella, on the Black Sea. Still later
she manufactured ink by some cheap process and in this, too, she
was successful, but she sold the business.
In 1864 she went to the south
of Russia, from thence to Greece, and finally to Egypt. There,
not having yet formed the opinion of the harmful nature of spiritualistic
séances, she founded with much enthusiasm a local spiritualist
society, during the sittings of which many strange things happened
which were several times affirmed by local newspapers. During
her sojourn in Cairo, Blavatsky, for the first time in her life,
displayed a new gift, that of seeing the death of people far distant.
In later years of her life this constantly happened. Scarcely
any one of her family or friends, who were at a distance of about
a thousand miles, died without her knowledge; she always saw them
and the same day wrote d,escribing the phenomena and enquiring
details of the death. "Is it true that Peter, the armless,
is.dead," she wrote to me next day after the death of our
mother's family servant before I had heard anything about it.
"I saw him, just imagine; one of our English lady mediums,
who was writing against one of the Pharaoh tombs, began to write
sentences in a language which none of her companions could read.
I was a little further oft and approached the tomb just in time
to save from destruction a slip of paper containing, as those
present thought, unintelligible signs. I read the following appeal
to me in Russian. 'Help me, Barishnia[6] pray for me, Barishnia;
I am thirsty; I suffer.' As the person called me Barishnia I guessed
that it was one of our own servants. So I took a pencil myself."
The writer, who called himself
Peter Koutchereff, told Blavatsky that he had died the day before
in the poorhouse where he had been placed, together with his brother,
after the death of older members of Fadéefs family and
the departure of the young ones from Tiflis. Peter told Blavatsky
that his brother had died, too, not long before; and everything
proved to be exactly true. Poor Peter had been all his life a
terrible drunkard and possibly was punished with a terrible thirst,
requital for his sin. After that séance, Peter appeared
to H.P.B. and she wrote about matter in the same letter from Egypt,
the man having died in Tiflis this the day before. I would like
to add that the telegraph did not exist in the Caucasus at that
time, even had anyone chosen to send her this uninteresting message.
II
In the year 1873 H. P. Blavatsky
went to America. The Englishman, Sinnett, her biographer. in his
book, Incidents in the life of Madame Blavalsky, asserts that
she already had at that time constant psychic relations with her
teachers (Masters) of the occult, in Tibet and Ceylon and that
she was always ready to travel from country to country in obedience
to their orders. It is left to the opinion of believers or sceptics
to judge how far Sinnett was right; the fact is that scarcely
had she entered this realm of spiritualism, where the Phenomena
of materialisation already displayed themselves, than she began
to express her sorrow and her indignation of it (spiritualism)
in her letters. Her visit to the "Cottage Vermontof the brothers
Eddy, of whom Colonel Olcott[7], wrote an entire book under the
title People from the Other World,[8] was the last stone in the
scales of Blavatsky's opinion of spiritualism. She began to write
in the American magazines one article after another explaining
to people the dangers of mediumism, and her letters showed her
irritation at the abuse of the strength of spiritualists, the
health of the mediums and the credulity of the public.
At the Eddys' H.P.B. met for
the first time an ardent spiritualist, a colonel of the American
army, Henry Olcott, who had fought for the freedom of the slaves.
Very soon she succeeded in bringing him to her way of thinking.
Both ardent opponents of materialism, they did not deny the benefit
of bringing to a world becoming coarsened by irreligion this sudden
invasion of spiritualism; but they thought that its part in the
scheme was to be limited to converting spiritualistic societies
to religion, to "something which our wise men did not dream
of' but not to bringing them to another extreme, to superstition
and to the calling up of evil powers, in other words to "black
magic".
"What sort of spiritualists
are we, for God's sake?" wrote she to her relatives. "If
I united here the newly formed Theosophical Society, a branch
of the Aryan brotherhood of India, it is only because its members
fight honestly against the abuse of power by pseudo prophets,
the priests of Calchases, and against certain fallacies of the
spiritualists. We are probably spiritualists, also, only not in
the American fashion but in the ancient Alexandrian sense."
Very soon the American newspapers
began to praise her articles, and the critical analysis of her
press dispute with Professor Huxley, the upholder of materialism,
caused much comment, During this time she decided to write her
first scientific work, Isis Unveiled. Her letters began to contain
more frequent and more determinate hints that what she wrote did
not originate with her, that she herself did not understand what
was going on in her being, that she talked and wrote about scientific
and abstract matters, not of herself (because she "did not
know anything about them") but it was put into her mind and
dictated to her by someone who knew everything.
This strange manifestation, at
the age of forty[9], of deep, scientific knowledge from some unknown
source, together with the indication of some mysterious "inspiration",
very much alarmed her relatives. They, for a while, feared for
her mind.
"Tell me, my dear",
wrote she to her aunt[10], are you interested in physiologic-psychological
mysteries? The following is a wonderful problem then. We have
in our society very learned members, for example Professor Wilder,
archaeologist-orientalist. All of them come to me with questions
and they assert that I know oriental languages and sciences, both
positive and abstract, better than they do. This is a fact and
one cannot deny a fact. Now, tell me, how could it happen that
I, until middle age a complete ignoramus, am now a phenomenon
of knowledge in the eyes, of men of science? Don't you think it
is an insoluble mystery? I am a psychological problem, a puzzle
and an enigma for the coming generations-a sphinx. Only think.
I, who never studied anything in my life, I, who had no idea of
chemistry, physics and zoology, am now writing on these subjects.
I have disputes with men of science and beat them. I am not joking,
I am talking seriously; I am frightened because I don't understand
how it has happened. Everything I read now seems familiar to me.
I find mistakes in scientific articles, in the lectures of Tyndall,
Herbert Spencer, Huxley and others. I am visited from morning
till night by professors, doctors of science and theologians.
They start disputes and I always prove that I am right. Where
is all this from? Am I bewitched?"
At the same time she sent clippings
from different newspapers which proved her oral and written victories
over different authorities. These same clippings announced to
the world many such incredible facts about occult, phenomenal
characteristics and abilities of the founder of the Theosophical
Society that people of sound sense simply could not believe it.
"The phenomena", or simply "miracles- which are
described in 'books by her partisans, Olcott, judge, and later
Sinnett and many others, brought Mme. Blavatsky only sorrow and
accusations of charlatanism instead of fame. Sometimes eager friends
are more dangerous than enemies. They only aroused mistrust in
Theosophical teachings and in its founder, extolling that which
she herself always called with contempt "psychological tricks"
known to hundreds of people in India.
Her enemies, and they were numerous,
made use of the imprudence of Mme. Blavatsky's partisans and accused
her of "these tricks". Even if no one had ever heard
about them it would not harm the cause and it would not lessen
the value of her works, about which there are no two opinions:
her friends and her enemies agree in acknowledging them ingenious.
Her first chief work, Isis Unveiled, evoked hundreds of flattering
criticisms[11], first in the American and later in the European
press. Very few Russian people have read these two thick volumes
with their long columns of minute references to writers of all
countries. It is a remarkable fact that two prominent Russian
men, the Armenian Archbishop, Most Reverend Aivazovsky, and the
talented novelist, Vsevolod Sergeievich Solovieff, agreed in their
opinion of this classical work of Mme. Blavatsky. The former had
scarcely finished reading Isis Unveiled and Sinnett's Occult World,
which throughout relates of phenomena, when he wrote to me that
in his opinion "there cannot be a higher phenomenon than
the appearance of such a work from the pen of a woman". The
latter (Solovieff) writes in 1884, July 7, from Paris, near the
same : "I read the second part of Isis and am completely
persuaded that this is a phenomenon."[12]
I think that these two opinions
are enough for us Russians to prove that the book has irrefutable
merits.
(To be continued.)
Who wrote under the nom-de-plume, "Zinaida
R-va".
He was a very good but by no means an extraordinary
middle-aged man occupying a government position at that time in
the Caucasus.
It is usual in Russia to refer to people by surname
only.
Raja Yoga - great man of wisdom. Raja Yoga should
not be confused with fakirs or plain prestidigitators who demonstrate
wonderful phenomena everywhere in India.
It will be noted that Mme. Jelihovsky never became
an adherent of Theosophical teachings, and that in this short
account of her sister's life she merely sets out faithfully to
record and describe facts which may be classified under three
headings; those which she herself observed, those related to her
by other observers, and those gathered from Mme. Blavatsky's own
statements, both oral and written.
"Barishnia" = "Miss".
The future President of the Theosophical Society
and H.P.B.'s co-worker in-all its affairs from the very beginning.
People, from the Other World, which attracted the
attention of Russians after the articles about it by professor
Wagner in Russki Vestnik.
Her age must surely have been about forty-five!
adejda Andreyevna Fadéef.
Blavatsky herself considered this the weakest of
all her works. In the article "My Books", one of her
last articles in her magazine, Lucifer, she simply declared this
to be so, confessing that at that time her knowledge of English
was so poor that much of it was confusedly written (despite her
writing under inspiration).
Later on Mr. Solovieff changed his opinion and
tried to prove the contrary, but his letters, which I have kept,
prove his falseness.


|